down site
donwload site
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud should be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.
Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.
Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).
Webhard
It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.
In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only should be in a folder.
You will need to share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***
It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it's the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment much like MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point)
It includes a large capacity. It is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you must find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
Google Drive
It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.
It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to connect with other Google services such as for example Gmail.
If you don't upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.
There are the most apps which can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.
If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)
Dropbox
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world in terms of media reading.
There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.
The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...
You will find a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself cannot be documented.
There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you want to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.
Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little use of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on a computer than listen to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).
It was recently updated (on 22 February?). p2p사이트 Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***
Skydrive
The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud should be downloaded all together, while streaming. Just to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.
Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.
Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).
Webhard
It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.
In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only should be in a folder.
You will need to share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive looks like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***
It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it's the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment much like MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point)
It includes a large capacity. It is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's in that state, you must find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
Google Drive
It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.
It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to connect with other Google services such as for example Gmail.
If you don't upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos could be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.
There are the most apps which can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it's not stipulated by company policy.
If you are using Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)
Dropbox
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world in terms of media reading.
There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't bother with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit that could be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.
The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...
You will find a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected instantly when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself cannot be documented.
There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you want to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.
Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are provided. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped on the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little use of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is very disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on a computer than listen to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's less than Google Drive).
It was recently updated (on 22 February?). p2p사이트 Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***
Skydrive
The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.
Public Last updated: 2021-06-11 09:34:31 AM